| Advertisment |
|
|||||||
| Flaming and Country Bashing Wish to get a load off your chest about something? Best place for that is in here. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 |
|
I'm Watching You
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Cypress, TX
Posts: 22,778
|
ADVERTISEMENT: Look familiar?
![]() Name: AT-4 Manufacturer: FFV Ordnance, Sweden and Alliant Techsystems Calibre: 84mm Magazine Capacity: N/A Rate of Fire: N/A Weight: 1.8Kg Notes: "The M136 AT4 is the Army's primary light anti-tank weapon. The M136 AT4 is a recoilless rifle used primarily by Infantry Forces for engagement and defeat of light armor. The recoilless rifle design permits accurate delivery of an 84mm High Explosive Anti-Armor warhead, with negligible recoil. The M136 AT4 is a lightweight, self-contained, antiarmor weapon consisting of a free-flight, fin-stabilized, rocket-type cartridge packed in an expendable, one-piece, fiberglass-wrapped tube. The M136 AT4 is man-portable and is fired from the right shoulder only..." -
__________________
That's what the internet is for, to slander others anonymously. |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
I'm Watching You
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Cypress, TX
Posts: 22,778
|
![]()
__________________
That's what the internet is for, to slander others anonymously. |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Basic Member
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Fort Stewart GA
Posts: 5,734
|
You know Bone...I've shot those in real life but never at a human being like you kept doing to me!
This weekend.....IT'S ON!!!! ......and I'm bringin a whole truckload of them badboys mister! Expect some screenshots....hehehehe. Let me know what time you'll be servin' up them AT4s. I'll do my best to be there to partake in the carnage.
__________________
ain't got no signature. |
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Join the DFLW Hardcore team guys. We'll let you use all the AT4s you can handle
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Hey Spartan, I got to shoot one too but on a range. Pretty cool though. Hit a track and every hatch on that thing went flying. Would hate to be in a vehicle that got hit my one. Still no comparison to the Dragon or TOW.
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Do you have to be in the military to shoot 'em?
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Not necessarily.....
We have a civil service contracted outfit that tests various weapons for the military.
Mines, Rockets & mortars, etc... We also Demil. outdated arms, teardown/detonate. The really lame thing was when we demilitarized chemical weapons under NATO Team inspection- Treaty agreement... While this was going on, Saddam was trying to build them. |
|
|
#9 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Well I don't know if this is the same in the US but here we have "open day's" than you can fire all sorts of weapons and fire in a tank. So if you wan't to shoot one of those try going to those open day's.
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Basic Member
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Fort Stewart GA
Posts: 5,734
|
We let family memebers shoot our weapons from time to time but I've never heard of a non-military member geting to use anything with high explosive whether it be a mine or a missile.
I imagine Wulf is in an extremly rare position. You must have an official reason to shoot this stuff. I've shot them many times. NEO69 will probably remember the demonstration I did for his cycle of basic training in which I shot a T-55 with one on a range. I always shot one of the AT4s during the demo for the trainees during the training range known as US Weapons. Ususally two drill sergeants fired one AT4 each. I shot a bunch of them in Iraq too. They are unbelieveably loud and a rush to shoot.
__________________
ain't got no signature. |
|
|
|
|
#11 | |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Quote:
For some strange reason I felt compelled to do that. Don't ask me why.. Maybe because of all the times you followed me around correcting me.. [Edited by Asswhooper on 12-22-2000 at 02:05 PM] |
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Basic Member
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Fort Stewart GA
Posts: 5,734
|
That's OK Asswhooper.
The way I see it.....you'll be looking for years to find as many corrections as I have on you ![]() But seriously, I have noticed a major improvement in your spelling and grammar! I can't remember when was the last time I saw a blatant spelling error on your part.
__________________
ain't got no signature. |
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
It's not that I learned it, I knew it. I never took the time or cared about my spelling. That was a habbit I picked up from being in the chat forum all day.
|
|
|
#14 | |
|
Basic Member
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Fort Stewart GA
Posts: 5,734
|
Quote:
I'm sorry man but I couldn't resist this. LOL
__________________
ain't got no signature. |
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Man, I knew it. Uhhh, I was just testing you... Jk
I had that right the first time and I went back and changed it. I was thinking one B would be Hay-bit so I changed it. Now I feel dumb.. Rabbit.. Habbit.. damnit! |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|